Going Wide With Wildlife

by ingrid on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 · 15 comments

in Birds, Pacific Northwest, Photography, PNW Posts

I loved my first zoom lens so much, I would have kept it around my neck and under my pillow 24/7 were I not worried about the integrity of the front element … and my neck. I suspect that a lot of wildlife watchers like myself feel profoundly altered after shooting through their first tele lens. The reach of a 200mm, 400mm or 600mm creates intimacy in a way that actually changes your relationship to the animals you are photographing. You get to know them — the way they blink and yawn and ruffle their hair. And then you live with them as you post-process your way through the jpegs or RAW files, noting every nuance of plumage and claw.

So, a telephoto enables my connection to wildlife. But, I also find it too easy to get stuck in the tight framing of 3×2 or 4×3 closeups, forgetting to use the wide end of my tele — or even a wide angle — when photographing animals. I was thinking about this very thing when I came upon a Moose Peterson blog post from earlier this year: Do You Need to Fill the Frame?. He writes:

“When you fill the frame with the head of a critter, the rest of the image is taken care of because, there is no room for any other element. There is nothing that can take the mind’s eye from the subject. When the subject doesn’t fill the frame and in this example of a Great Egret, doesn’t even come close, making sure you see that subject and then move the eye around the frame and back to the subject I think is a gargantuan hurdle to the great image.”

Take a look at the Great Egret image he references in the above quote. I love wide, atmospheric shots of wild animals and find them (as his comment suggests) difficult to execute in a way that makes them stand out. The old adage is to shoot wide, medium then closeup for full coverage. I usually start in the opposite direction, grabbing some closeups, then going wider if the shot is still there at that point.

In many cases, a wide angle lens isn’t practical for me, unless the animals are so tame I can frame them as foreground without bothering them. I’ve done that with pelicans habituated to fishing piers, pigeons, and Seattle’s friendly gulls.

Gull on Seattle waterfront

Over-Gull Over Seattle - ©ingridtaylar

Right now, I don’t have a blind, a ghillie suit, nor a long cable release setup that allows for that stealth, wide photography. But what I often do have is plenty of distance from my subjects, where I can shoot them at the wide end of my telephoto. Sometimes, as in the case of this eagle image, the animals are so far afield, I can get a wide shot near the far reach of my lens. I like this shot because it shows the bucolic setting in which these juvenile Bald Eagles are bathing in a flooded field.

Juvenile Bald Eagles in Skagit Valley field

Juvie Bald Eagles in Skagit Valley - ©ingridtaylar

Here are a few others I’ve taken in the past year, either because I wanted to show the context and environment — or because I was looking for a creative way to either shoot a distant animal, or back off from a closeup. If you have some wide-shot favorites of wild animals, please feel free to post a link in the comments below. I’d love to explore other photographers’ inspirations and motivations for going wide with wildlife shots.

——————————-

These pigeons roost on the bridge that takes me from my apartment to downtown Seattle. I often walk under their perches, and on this evening, the confluence of pigeons, moon and plan was difficult to resist from a photographic standpoint. Shot with a point-and-shoot.

Pigeon Plane Moon

Pigeon - Plane - Moon - ©ingridtaylar

I have a few closeups of this same Humpback whale and fluke in the Strait of Juan de Fuca (Washington), but in this case, I loved the misty backdrop of a Northwest fall coming on.

Humpback Fluke in Strait of Juan de Fuca

Humpback Fluke - ©ingridtaylar

Every night, flocks of hundreds of crows bath and roost in various parts of Seattle. This particular flock makes a regular stop at Union Bay Natural Area (the former Montlake Fill). I was going for a shot that would show what it’s like to see the birds fly from tree to tree until they finally launch en masse to their northern roost. I’m still working on this concept and project.

Seattle Crows in Flight

Crows in Flight - ©ingridtaylar

This cormorant was silhouetted against a Vancouver sunset as we walked the Seawall at Stanley Park. The cormorant had the appearance of a welcoming committee for the ship in the distance.

Cormant and Ship in English Bay Vancouver

Cormorant + Ship + English Bay - ©ingridtaylar

I called this one “The Waiting is the Hardest Part.” The image shows one salmon trying in vain to breach the barrier to the river above, while others below either try the jump themselves, or redirect to the fish ladder opening (to the right of this shot).

Salmon at Issaquah Hatchery

Issquah Hatchery - ©ingridtaylar

The city and Port of Tacoma, south of Seattle, is implementing some habitat restoration projects. But, this image shows the challenges inherent in that task. A row of cormorants preens as a barge stacked with crushed automobiles, enters the port, heading toward a scrap metal yard.

Cormorants in Tacoma

Cormorants in Tacoma - ©ingridtaylar

None of my closeups of this Red-tailed Hawk were as interesting as shots of the tree in which he (or she) was perched.

Hawk perched in tree at Spencer Island

Gnarly - ©ingridtaylar

I shot this just the other day with a point-and-shoot. I noticed an occasional flight was passing behind this huge roost of pigeons. I like the contrast of a different kind of big, mechanical bird, approaching the pigeon roost. Shot in Georgetown, just south of Seattle.

Southwest Airlines flight behind rows of perched pigeons

Southwest on Approach - ©ingridtaylar

There were 15+ Double-crested Cormorants diving in and out of the foamy swill, just below the Ballard Locks spillway. Each time a cormorant surfaced, it looked like a periscope in a big bubble bath, and that’s the capture I was going for here.

Cormorant in foam at Ballard Locks spillway

Into the Spillway - ©ingridtaylar

Related Posts with Thumbnails

0 :: CLICK if you liked this post, most of it, or at least 7.27% of it

{ 15 comments… read them below or add one }

Mia McPherson March 28, 2012 at 5:48 am

Ingrid,

I like to photograph images where the subject is small in the frame, especially when the setting is as much a part of the mood as the bird or animal is. Like you I will go for the close up first and then zoom back if the subject sticks around.

Reply

ingrid March 29, 2012 at 3:34 pm

Hi, Mia, yeah, I do think the context matters. It’s one thing to start wide on an immovable building. As far as subjects small in the frame, I think there’s an art and elegance to getting that right. I can’t say I’ve mastered it, but I love seeing images where the photographer did just that.

Reply

Steve Borichevsky March 28, 2012 at 12:58 pm

It’s all about the aesthetics, not the lenses. Good piece.

Reply

ingrid March 29, 2012 at 3:33 pm

Steve, I don’t know if you’ve seen the Chase Jarvis book on iPhone photography. The title is, “The Best Camera is the One That’s With You.”

Reply

John Raymond March 29, 2012 at 1:15 am

Nice images and thoughts as always, Ingrid!
It truly is perspective and context and the arrangement there of.
Isn’t it wonderful how simplicity to the point is often more beautiful and powerful than
complexity and overcrowding? Musicians that overplay or artists who overpaint, overcrowd would do better
to stay to a few notes or a few strokes of shades of colors to hang a message on.

Skeletal Beatle songs, please! Yngwie Malmsteen overfed shreds, no thank you : )

Reply

ingrid March 29, 2012 at 3:37 pm

John, you crack me up. I’m sure Hugh knows Yngwie Malmsteen, but I confess, I had to look him up. The first vid, at the top of the list was Arpeggios From Hell (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aS_IYe5JTZ4). That says it all, I think. Skeletal Beatles should be a new band.

Reply

Hugh March 29, 2012 at 12:22 pm

Nice series of flyers and swimmers in context! There is a story in every frame. Sweet!

Reply

ingrid March 29, 2012 at 3:38 pm

Thanks, Hugh. I think you were there for every one of those captures except for the hawk and the crows.

Reply

John Raymond March 29, 2012 at 3:53 pm

Skeletal Beatles, we are sadly halfway there already : |
Skeletal Beatles…sounds very much like a new Jello Biafra band?? DK version 2? (keeping it inside as to not offend anyone..)

Did you guys make it to Ocean Shores? Snowy’s are on final takeoff!

Reply

ingrid March 29, 2012 at 4:01 pm

Good call on the Jello Biafra potential. d:-) No … no Ocean Shores trips, darn it! We’re heading to Olympic National Park in a couple of weeks, though (I’m very excited). Are there any Snowies left at O.S.? We saw the Boundary Bay owls one last time on a trip to Vancouver a few weeks ago. There were fewer annoyances in the field this time. I think people were finally getting the message.

Reply

John Raymond March 29, 2012 at 4:14 pm

I read on tweeters they are still there but will be off soon if like 2006.
Shorebirds are on our flooded ponds right now and when the sun was out for 15 minutes a few days back it appeared alot of summer birds were here.
We did have Snow Geese until a week ago and this was the first year we had more than a one-off rare sighting. We can go 10 years without seeing a single Snow Goose so this year was very special.
Swans were a little lighter in numbers but there was the cool single Mute Swan mixed in.

Alot of activity around as I am sure you have noticed it as well?
ONP, eagles will be getting a tad less in numbers but look in the creeks for some sockeye.
The rainforest will be in prime condition! Good timing for sure.

Reply

ingrid March 30, 2012 at 10:41 pm

John, in the observation window at the Ballard Locks, I saw what looked like a trout but what a ranger said might be a juvenile Steelhead. Does that seem right in terms of timing?

Reply

Hugh March 29, 2012 at 10:34 pm

Yes to John’s comment. Love the use of negative space. Clarity. Focus. Evocative imagery.

Reply

ingrid March 30, 2012 at 10:41 pm

Nice gravatar. :)

Reply

Hugh March 31, 2012 at 10:25 am

Yah, mon! ;-)

Reply

Leave a Comment

Choose Your Favorite Recent Post

Previous post:

Next post: